Strenght of a Force Buble

[The Devil's Advocate]

Mostly, though it wasn't clear if you were agreeing or dissagreeing on the statements. The point is you might as well try the pencil. It's not going to hurt anything.

~The Devil's Advocate

[confuded92]

I am agreeingvto your staitment. I am so unclear these days...

[The Devil's Advocate]

Don't worry about it. We can always ask for clarification. I'm more likely to go easy on you and just ask, than I am on a native english speaker.

~The Devil's Advocate

[ryakoth]

its as strong as the energy you put into it, if you had enough energy I'm sure you could filter different gases to make the air you breath fresher and cause anything moving at you at a threatening rate to stop, although i think it would be more effective to cause it to change trajectory, less attention grabbing too

[The Devil's Advocate]

Efficiently applying the energy can do as much as brute force. It requires maximum efforts to directly opose a moving object and bring it to rest. Deflection is more efficient than oposition, though not neccissarily more effective. Assuming force bubbles follow the known laws of vectoral physics and angular motion. Assuming force bubbles follow similar trends in programing efficiency as normal shields and other constructs, the better the programing the less energy required by the shield. What the minimums are, is open for debate, interpretation, and out and out guessing.

~The Devil's Advocate

[confuded92]

Eee, DA you sad, "the better the programing thec less energy requires by the shield." What does better programing mean? Could i compare it to a program? For example: The better the program the less holes and bugs it has (if that makes sence to anyone).

[The Devil's Advocate]

Yes, it does confuded. And yes. Think of it like programing time, large complicated programs take longer to run. But a well written program that does not waste any steps isn't as slow, or likely to have errors that further slow down the running of a program. The programing of a construct are the instructions we put into it that define what it is suposed to be doing. For a shield they determine shape and very detailed functions. For a force bubble the programing governs the force and how the force is applied.

~The Devil's Advocate

[confuded92]

So constructs are not that simple...

[The Devil's Advocate]

Constructs can be very simple. A psiball is a very simple construct. They can also be very complicated, like my own shield matrix, or some of the 'fun' constructs I've played with. It depends on what you want them to do.

~The Devil's Advocate

[confuded92]

If not a sicret could you PM me what fun constructs there are to play with? And whats a Matrix shied?

[The Devil's Advocate]

I'll just start another thread with that information in it.

~The Devil's Advocate

[confuded92]

Yea this is getting of topic, i think somebody should close this thread... Its getting pathetic